Tuesday, May 8, 2012

1205.1297 (K. Maciesiak et al.)

On the pulse-width statistics in radio pulsars. III. Importance of the conal profile components    [PDF]

K. Maciesiak, J. Gil, G. Melikidze
This work is a continuation of two previous papers of a series, in which we examined the pulse-width statistics of normal radio pulsars. In the first paper we compiled the largest ever database of pulsars with interpulses in their mean profiles. In the second one we confirmed the existence of the lower boundary in the scatter plot of core component pulse-widths versus pulsar period W50 sim 2.5 P^{-0.5}[deg], first discovered by Rankin using much smaller number of interpulse cases. In this paper we show that the same lower boundary also exists for conal profile components. Rankin proposed a very simple method of estimation of pulsar inclination angle based on comparing the width W50 of its core component with the period dependent value of the lower boundary. We claim that this method can be extended to conal components as well. To explain an existence of the lower boundary Rankin proposed that the core emission originates at or near the polar cap surface. We demonstrated clearly that no coherent pulsar radio emission can originate at altitudes lower than 10 stellar radii, irrespective of the actual mechanism of coherence. We argue that the lower boundary reflects the narrowest angular structures that can be distinguished in the average pulsar beam. These structures represent the core and the conal components in mean pulsar profiles. The P^{-0.5} dependence follows from the dipolar nature of magnetic field lines in the radio emission region, while the numerical factor of about 2.5 deg reflects the curvature radius of a non-dipolar surface magnetic field in the partially screened gap above the polar cap, where dense electron-positron plasma is created. Both core and conal emission should originate at altitudes of about 50 stellar radii in a typical pulsar, with a possibility that the core beam is emitted at a slightly lower heights than the conal ones.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1297

No comments:

Post a Comment