J. S. Dunlop, R. J. McLure, B. E. Robertson, R. S. Ellis, D. P. Stark, M. Cirasuolo, L. de Ravel
It has recently been reported that the faintest galaxies at z~6-7 display extremely blue UV continuum slopes, with a UV power-law index beta ~ -3. Such slopes are bluer than previously reported for any other galaxy population, and imply extinction-free, young, very low-metallicity stellar populations with a high ionizing photon escape fraction. Here we undertake a critical study of the evidence for such extreme values of beta, combining three new WFC3/IR-selected samples of galaxies spanning ~2 decades in UV luminosity over the redshift range z~4.5-8. We explore the impact of inclusion/exclusion of less robust high-z candidates, and use the varying depths of the samples to explore the effects of noise and selection bias. Simple data-consistency arguments suggest that artificially blue average values of beta can result when the analysis is extended into the deepest ~ 0.5-mag bin of these WFC3/IR-selected samples, regardless of the actual luminosity or z range probed. By confining attention to robust, well-detected high-z galaxy candidates, we find that the average value of beta is consistent with -2.05 +/- 0.10 for z=5-7, and -22 < M_UV < -18. We create and analyse a set of simulations which demonstrate that a bias towards artifically low/blue average values of beta is indeed expected when the UV slope analysis is extended towards the source detection threshold, and conclude that there is as yet no clear evidence for UV slopes significantly bluer than beta ~ -2, the typical value displayed by the bluest star-forming galaxies at more modest z. A robust measurement of beta for the faintest galaxies at z~7-8 remains a key observational goal, as it provides a fundamental test for high escape fractions from a potentially abundant source of reionizing photons. This goal is achievable with HST, but requires still deeper WFC3/IR imaging in the HUDF.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5005
No comments:
Post a Comment